Debate- PCI or CABG for diabetics with left main stem disease

Debate- PCI or CABG for diabetics with left main stem disease

Coronary artery bypass grafting remains the treatment of choice for diabetics with left main stem disease.

The optimum revascularisation strategy for left main stem (LMS) disease between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains controversial. No single trial has compared outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or surgical coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in diabetics with unprotected LMS disease as the primary analysis. However, several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the two treatments include this comparison in subgroup analyses. 5-year follow up data is available for the NOBLE and EXCEL trial with 10 year data available for the SYNTAX and PRE-COMBAT trials. Of these studies, only SYNTAX was sufficiently powered for mortality as a primary endpoint with the others favouring the composite outcome of Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE), including cardiac death, stroke, and myocardial infarction.

Request Permissions

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center’s (CCC) Marketplace website by clicking the button below:

Debate- PCI or CABG for diabetics with left main stem disease

7th December 2022
Authors Affiliations
Damian Balmforth FRCS (CTh) PhD Royal Sussex County Hospital Eastern Road Brighton BN2 5BE
Rakesh Uppal FRCS (CTh) Barts Heart Centre St Bartholomew’s Hospital West Smithfield London EC1A 7BE

Debate- PCI or CABG for diabetics with left main stem disease

Cite this article as:

No PMID provided!

Debate- PCI or CABG for diabetics with left main stem disease

Share this article

Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.


Scroll to Top